About 711,000 results
Open links in new tab
  1. Falcon

    To give a point of comparison, Falcon -512 is roughly equivalent, in classical security terms, to RSA-2048, whose signatures and public keys use 256 bytes each.

  2. FALCON - Digital Signature

    Outline Falcon uses NTRU as a asymmetric encryption and has been benchmarked as twice as fast as RSA to encrypt, and three times faster to decrypt. NTRU is the public key method …

  3. Falcon (signature scheme) - Wikipedia

    The set of parameters suggested by Falcon imply a signature size of 666 bytes and a public key size of 897 bytes for the NIST security level 1 (security comparable to breaking AES -128 bits). …

  4. Falcon - Open Quantum Safe

    Falcon Algorithm type: Digital signature scheme. Main cryptographic assumption: hardness of NTRU lattice problems. Principal submitters: Thomas Prest. Auxiliary submitters: Pierre-Alain …

  5. “ In all our tested scenarios, we found that Falcon‐512 performs beter than Dilithium2 due to Falcon‐512’s smaller signatures, suggesting that Falcon‐512 may be the most suitable option …

  6. We propose a quantum-secure blockchain architecture, evaluating various PQC primitives and optimizing transaction sizes through tech-niques such as public-key recovery for Falcon, …

  7. Falcon - crypto-condor 2025.09.08 documentation - GitHub Pages

    Jan 31, 2025 · They have the advantages of providing a compact instantiation of GPV [DLP14], as their structure reduces the size of the public key, of speeding up many operations, and [SS13] …

  8. Falcon-512 Key Size Issue · Issue #1397 · bcgit/bc-java - GitHub

    May 19, 2023 · When comparing the key length between the Falcon standard specification and BC, the key length generated by BC is 1 byte shorter. When attempting to load the generated …

  9. FN-DSA (FALCON) - FIPS 206

    With Falcon-512 (which has an equivalent security to RSA-2048), we generate a public key of 897 bytes, a private key size of 1,281 bytes and a signature size of 690 bytes, while FALCON …

  10. Table 3.3 shows that for pipelined architecture, the clock frequency for the ASIC implementation in 65 nm technology is 120% faster for FALCON-512, 150% faster for FALCON-768, and …